August 1, 2016 Â https://cac2.org/cac2-members-reflections-national-cancer-moonshot-summit/
CAC2 member David Frazer (National Pediatric Cancer Foundation)
âThe Moonshot Summit was an event that gathered the principals within the oncology industry under the inspirational leadership of Vice President Biden.  In my opinion, all politics aside, Mr. Biden portrayed the type of leadership necessary to conduct systematic change to defeat cancer.  Historically, he has always been a champion for public health.  The summit was based on collaboration and change, and Mr. Biden facilitated an effective initiative to drive those focus topics.
On June 29, the Vice President gathered 300 cancer experts and advocates to Howard University. Of the 14 advocates and foundations representing pediatric cancer, all but two were CAC2 members, including both of the people selected to attend the closed afternoon small group working session with Vice President and Dr. Biden.
- David Arons (National Brain Tumor Society)
- Beth Anne Baber (The Nicholas Conor Institute)
- Vickie Buenger (CAC2)
- Mary Beth Collins (CAC2)
- David Frazer (National Pediatric Cancer Foundation)
- Nancy Goodman (Kids v Cancer)
- Amanda Haddock (Dragon Master Foundation)
- Frank Kalman (Kidsâ Cancer Research Foundation)
- Trish Kriger (Jeff Gordon Childrenâs Foundation)
- Liz Scott (Alexâs Lemonade Stand Foundation)
- Jeff Skolnick (CureSearch)
- Laura Thrall (CureSeach for Childrenâs Cancer)
The mission of the National Cancer Moonshot is to accelerate research efforts and break down barriers to progress by enhancing data access, and facilitating collaborations with researchers, doctors, philanthropies, patients, and patient advocates, and biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. The initiative aims to bring about a decadeâs worth of advances in five years, making more therapies available to more patients, while also improving our ability to prevent cancer and detect it at an early stage.
Participants from CAC2 observed that the people behind the initiative seemed to be making a sincere attempt to listen to a wide-range of ideas and opinions about what we can do to find cancer cures. They also expressed a uniform desire to guarantee that children, adolescents, and teens were part of the conversation. Our shared hope was that the Moonshot would make a difference and continue into the future.
The Summit included multiple speakers and lengthy working group meetings with facilitated focused topics. Comedian Carol Burnett prepared everyone for the day and brought the patient and family perspective to the gathering with grace, warmth, courage, and a dash of humor. When Vice President Biden spoke, he focused on several areas beyond the promised $1 billion of funding that he considered just as critical to achieving progress: federal regulations, drug prices, and the lack of collaboration among medical researchers and institutions. He stated in summary: âWe need to change the cultureâ in todayâs research community.
Our members attended a variety of working groups, including one devoted exclusively to Pediatric Cancer Research and Funding Issues. The session focused on barriers to progress for drug development for children with cancer. Nancy Goodman began the session by making the case for needed legislative fixes to the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) to give children better access to drugs as they are developed and move through the trial process. According to Frank Kalman, the group also discussed the lack of coordination or cooperation among pharmaceutical company during multi-agent trials and novel funding options.
Two of the small group workshops wrestled with infrastructure and data issues. Amanda Haddock optimistically noted that after her participation in Solving the Technical Challenges to Unleash the Power of Data, she realized that there was broad agreement that the technology exists and we know how to harness it. Ultimate success depends on people embracing and using the technology together. Amanda also attended Data: To What End?, which addressed the question of making sure that data is high quality, meaningful, and useful. The group aligned on the idea that we must move beyond a single solution towards systems that are accessible by clinicians, researchers, and patients alike for widely varied purposes
The session on the Voice of the Patient also had CAC2 representation. The overarching concern of participants in that session (mostly representing adult cancers) was the distrust of the doctors, the medical teams, and the testing for adults. Â This is combined with the struggle of lack of support and education starting at diagnosis and continued throughout the journey. Â These sentiments were echoed in almost every share regarding adult issues. Surprisingly, insurance did not emerge as large area of concern, and remission was not discussed at all by any of the adult-focused feedback. Â When the pediatric participants weighed in, they focused on Quality of Life, survivorship challenges, and a responsibility to provide appropriate support for chronic issues and related psychosocial concerns.
Another work team, Financing Cures for Cancer, asked participants to imagine a concrete set of actions around financial innovations. These included at least one alternative specifically designed for drug development for pediatric oncology based on creating a de-risked portfolio of compounds in development that might be attractive to pension funds and securities firms investors and might look something like a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT). This group also brainstormed about a Capital Stack approach that would let investors with different risk/return profiles invest together and mulled over the problem that academic researchers /basic scientists rely on different incentives than philanthropists and investors.
Pediatric advocate participants in the conversation with the Vice President and Dr. Biden quickly recognized that other patient groups cared just as strongly and worked just as tirelessly for the cancer patients they represent, as we do in our community. Yet David Frazer and Vickie Buenger made compelling cases in the meeting that children were different and needed more focused solutions and support because of the dependence they have on governmental funding in the absence of industry funding, because of the many decades of life they face after treatment, where they must carry the heavy burden of the late-term effects arising from their disease and their treatment regimens, and because cancer remains the number one disease killer of children, where in some cases there has been little or no progress in research options or survival rates. They also noted that those gathered and the broader cancer community could learn from the Childrenâs Oncology Group and from the many examples of collaboration and coalition building long practiced by necessity by childrenâs cancer community.
So whatâs next?
Blue Ribbon Panel component will complete its work and delivers its report to NCAB. The NCAB will review the panels report and deliver it to Moonshot Task Force and VP Biden. At the same time and continuing into the Fall, the Vice Presidentâs staff will continue to advance policy recommendations, procedure options, and best practices to advance cancer research. You can keep up with some of the continuing activities and milestones being logged by the National Cancer Institute here: http://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/moonshot-cancer-initiative/milestones
Along side the work in the governmental channels, organizations of all sizes and missions will use the contacts they have made, the spirit of working together that embodies the Moonshot, and the shared vision of making a difference for cancer sufferers to find ways to breakdown silos, work together, and advance progress more quickly. Â This opportunity sounds a lot like what we do at CAC2.
Thank you so much for giving us a glimpse of what it was like. I hosted a Summit in my local area and I was very curious how things went âat the big one.â I appreciate so much what all of you have done to contribute, with a special note for David Frazer and Vicki Buenger for speaking up for our children, that they do deserve special attention and have been neglected, with regard to Government Funding which was not part of the larger conversation. In our replies and our report for the OVP, we noted that the only question we were to respond to about funding pediatric cancer research was the question of âwhat greater incentives we could create in the private sectorâ, which, though important, avoids entirely the issue that has been very upsetting to many parents in the Childhood Cancer Community, that of the 4%.
Thank you so much for representing so well the hopes and dreams of us all.